Heck, the $ninety BC folder is shorter/handier if you consider it. So you want a significant CQB rifle - Why don't you invest in a pleasant AR for that sort of $? The mini is a great GP rifle, however it's challenging to make the arguement that a mini (no matter what wrapper It can be in) is better than a very good AR for CQB. Also, I concur they need to have employed a stock similar to the M-14 design. I do are convinced it's a slick set-up tho.
It is tough to assume that cost for a normal Mini-14 but Drake would make a terrific situation and has exceptional information
Oh yeah, most departments that DO have ACG's laying all-around are mostly manufactured just before 1986 so they can trade them in for your Tune to sellers who'll re-sale them to non-public citizens. What number of restricted M4's do you're thinking that they are going to get for one particular ACG that may resale for $5000+ bucks! Oh yeah, they may also get far more dependable 30 round mags for the more widespread AR System Plus more equipment that are created by practically Most people today.
Past, my actual point is this: I believe the necessity is to choose from for your stock similar to this while in the under $300 vary for civilians, plus the Sage (while quite tempting) is simply a little far too higher for that industry. I question it's going to occur down in price. As well bad!
Content: I’ve talked about before that the Ruger Mini fourteen stock might be Wooden or artificial. Your option of material affects the effectiveness of one's stock. You should look for weatherproofing. Vulnerability to oils and cleaning solvents can be a priority. Synthetic stocks will often be most well-liked in excess of Wooden stocks.
Certain, they may do away with their full stock and purchase all new AR-15s, but would that really be the higher and a lot more cost effective option?
The Mini-14 offered perfectly within a environment not however inured to Frightening black rifles. That appears positively quaint in retrospect. The A-Workforce
Add to quote Only exhibit this person #19 · Jun 14, 2006 I really like this thread. All you men make some very good points. A couple of points: I think the exclusive M-14 butt stock was adopted by Sage because of fears the AR tele-stocks could not tackle 7.62 NATO recoil - Individually I type of doubt that, but I browse that someplace. The AR butt stock to the Mini model is outwardly a value saving evaluate, and I could Reside with that, but I might want the exceptional collapsible form. Next, if you really think about it, how big would be the LEO AC-556 sector? Most agencies are in the process of modifying over for the AR platform. The AC-556s are obtaining old (when was the final SWAT group you noticed on Tv set armed with AC-556s?). Loads of the younger guys coming in, People with military services expertise, are by now trained around the AR platform.
On the other hand, thoroughly weigh the price, fat, and set up prerequisites before making a obtain. Complete investigation and comparison browsing will let you obtain the right EBR chassis to meet your person needs.
The M14 EBR-RI is built with a totally collapsible stock program, making it appropriate for use in cramped environments.
This really is an older thread, you might not get a response, and will be reviving an old thread. Make sure you think about creating a new thread.
Mike Rock collaborated with engineer Jim Ribordy to make the new rifle. Checks showed that their rifle was productive, but had abnormal sound issues.
A chassis procedure in your Mini-fourteen is not just an aesthetic enhance; It is a big improvement to the rifle's overall operation. This is why lots of shooters opt for this modification:
Irrespective, the execution below is superb and it undoubtedly does give the functions of the tactical rifle. All of the elements on it are proprietary, nonetheless, so you check here won't find a way to install widespread AR furnishings or grips on it.